<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The dog lover&#8217;s heaven</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/07/the-dog-lovers-heaven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/07/the-dog-lovers-heaven/</link>
	<description>a few graffiti on the wall of life</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirk</title>
		<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/07/the-dog-lovers-heaven/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/07/the-dog-lovers-heaven/#comment-639</guid>
		<description>And of course Revelation 22:15 is not about pet pooches but about male prostitutes, as in Deuteronomy 23:18. The problem is, if the Church of England decides to let the latter into heaven, or at least into its priesthood, will it have to exclude the former?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course Revelation 22:15 is not about pet pooches but about male prostitutes, as in Deuteronomy 23:18. The problem is, if the Church of England decides to let the latter into heaven, or at least into its priesthood, will it have to exclude the former?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
