<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wright before the New Perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/08/wright-before-the-new-perspective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/08/wright-before-the-new-perspective/</link>
	<description>a few graffiti on the wall of life</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/08/wright-before-the-new-perspective/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/08/wright-before-the-new-perspective/#comment-834</guid>
		<description>Not on my reading. I think Cranfield is an excellent example of a commentary from a Reformed perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not on my reading. I think Cranfield is an excellent example of a commentary from a Reformed perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graham</title>
		<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/08/wright-before-the-new-perspective/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/08/wright-before-the-new-perspective/#comment-831</guid>
		<description>Doesn't Cranfield pre-date all of them? He certainly flirted with a number of the ideas that Wright later brought to light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t Cranfield pre-date all of them? He certainly flirted with a number of the ideas that Wright later brought to light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/08/wright-before-the-new-perspective/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 21:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/08/wright-before-the-new-perspective/#comment-829</guid>
		<description>It takes a different view of Paul, but a similar view of Judaism. Most NPP views agree that Sanders was basically right on Judaism and the concept of "covenantal nomism" but not particularly good in the way he applied it to  Paul. My main point is that Wright expresses an early version of his view &lt;b&gt;two years&lt;/b&gt; before the NPP is supposed to have officially taken off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes a different view of Paul, but a similar view of Judaism. Most NPP views agree that Sanders was basically right on Judaism and the concept of &#8220;covenantal nomism&#8221; but not particularly good in the way he applied it to  Paul. My main point is that Wright expresses an early version of his view <b>two years</b> before the NPP is supposed to have officially taken off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirk</title>
		<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/08/wright-before-the-new-perspective/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 21:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/08/wright-before-the-new-perspective/#comment-828</guid>
		<description>I'm by no means an expert in this area. But I must say I can't see that what Wright wrote in 1980 goes beyond what Sanders had written in 1977, as reported by McKnight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m by no means an expert in this area. But I must say I can&#8217;t see that what Wright wrote in 1980 goes beyond what Sanders had written in 1977, as reported by McKnight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
