<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creation and Cosmos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/11/creation-and-cosmos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/11/creation-and-cosmos/</link>
	<description>a few graffiti on the wall of life</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ElShaddai Edwards</title>
		<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/11/creation-and-cosmos/#comment-1663</link>
		<dc:creator>ElShaddai Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2007/11/creation-and-cosmos/#comment-1663</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;They are not as interested in the question of origins as they are in the question of the present, despite their form.&lt;/i&gt;

Brilliant. I've long held that Genesis 1 is a statement of understanding located in a specific time of human knowledge. To read it or interpret it with 21st century theological or scientific knowledge renders the text almost meaningless from its original "what is this world we live in?" context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>They are not as interested in the question of origins as they are in the question of the present, despite their form.</i></p>
<p>Brilliant. I&#8217;ve long held that Genesis 1 is a statement of understanding located in a specific time of human knowledge. To read it or interpret it with 21st century theological or scientific knowledge renders the text almost meaningless from its original &#8220;what is this world we live in?&#8221; context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
