<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excessive optimism about creationists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2008/01/excessive-optimism-about-creationists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2008/01/excessive-optimism-about-creationists/</link>
	<description>a few graffiti on the wall of life</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2008/01/excessive-optimism-about-creationists/#comment-2535</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2008/01/excessive-optimism-about-creationists/#comment-2535</guid>
		<description>I haven't ever really studied this issue too much but now that I am pastoring in the Grand Canyon National Park I am thinking I need to look into these issues a little more - try googling Tom Vail and Canyon Ministries and let me know what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t ever really studied this issue too much but now that I am pastoring in the Grand Canyon National Park I am thinking I need to look into these issues a little more - try googling Tom Vail and Canyon Ministries and let me know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2008/01/excessive-optimism-about-creationists/#comment-2514</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2008/01/excessive-optimism-about-creationists/#comment-2514</guid>
		<description>Fair enough, Claude. Keep that glass half-full!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough, Claude. Keep that glass half-full!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude Mariottini</title>
		<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2008/01/excessive-optimism-about-creationists/#comment-2511</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude Mariottini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2008/01/excessive-optimism-about-creationists/#comment-2511</guid>
		<description>Doug,

I agree with you that many criationists are not willing to hear or read anything that contradicts what they already believe.  However, someone must teach them the truth.  This was what motivated me to ask them to read the third chapter of the book.

Claude Mariottini</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug,</p>
<p>I agree with you that many criationists are not willing to hear or read anything that contradicts what they already believe.  However, someone must teach them the truth.  This was what motivated me to ask them to read the third chapter of the book.</p>
<p>Claude Mariottini</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2008/01/excessive-optimism-about-creationists/#comment-2509</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2008/01/excessive-optimism-about-creationists/#comment-2509</guid>
		<description>Conversion, yes. But as in all conversions, more than simple (or indeed, complex) argument is needed. However, I was probably not precise enough in the first part of my post, though I was in the final paragraph. I meant that they would not be persuaded by any valid &lt;b&gt;scientific&lt;/b&gt; argument. They have already defined any evolutionary (or at least in their terms macro-evolutionary) science to be godless and unbiblical, and are therefore unable to listen to the arguments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conversion, yes. But as in all conversions, more than simple (or indeed, complex) argument is needed. However, I was probably not precise enough in the first part of my post, though I was in the final paragraph. I meant that they would not be persuaded by any valid <b>scientific</b> argument. They have already defined any evolutionary (or at least in their terms macro-evolutionary) science to be godless and unbiblical, and are therefore unable to listen to the arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Anthony Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2008/01/excessive-optimism-about-creationists/#comment-2508</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Anthony Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metacatholic.co.uk/2008/01/excessive-optimism-about-creationists/#comment-2508</guid>
		<description>Doug,

While you are correct in the main, isn't it also true that there is a potential for conversion?

-JAK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug,</p>
<p>While you are correct in the main, isn&#8217;t it also true that there is a potential for conversion?</p>
<p>-JAK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
