Feb 07 2008
I’m waiting
Updated Friday 8 Feb, 10.45
The Internet seems to produce a rush to judgement, and blogging is it’s apotheosis. Today’s reaction to Rowan Williams’ rather academic (and therefore both obscure and nuanced) reflections on Sharia and UK law seem to typify that. See here, here and here (especially the comments on the latter two which exhibit most forms of prejudice known to humanity).
What seems to have been missed are some of the comparisons, I quote from the interview:
It’s not a new problem, not to mention the issues as I mentioned earlier the questions about how the consciences of Catholics Anglicans and others who have difficulty over issues like abortion are accommodated within the Law; so the whole idea that there are perfectly proper ways in which the law of the land pays respect to custom and community; that’s already there.
I think at the moment there’s a great deal of confusion about this; a lot of what’s been written whether it was about the Catholic church adoptions agencies last year, sometimes what’s written about Jewish or Muslim communities; a lot of what’s written suggests that the ideal situation is one in which there is one law and only one law for everybody;
I think those are interesting comparisons: a religiously inspired exemption of conscience (from some 40 years ago) for doctors and nurses not to perform abortions; no religious exemption from last year’s law on adoptions. Looking at the comments on the various stories and postings I can’t help but think that most of those commenting would oppose one law for all in both these instances.
I am, myself, very dubious about the Archbishop’s musings here, although I do think he has identified an “unspeakable about” issue in current thinking that needs to be thought about coherently and consistently. He does sometimes seem oblivious to the impact of his position on his more academic reflections, and badly advised on their media spin. Were it not for people like Peter Akinola of Nigeria and Peter Jensen of Sydney (to say nothing of the Bishop of Rochester) he could appear his own worst enemy.
I shall wait for the full transcript of his remarks, and suggest that others should also.
Update: There is an excellent and helpfully moderate post on this over at Bishop Alan’s Blog. Also well worth reading is Paul Vallely’s reflection on, effectively, why the archbishop’s media officer isn’t up to the job.
