MetaCatholic

MetaCatholic

a few graffiti on the wall of life

MetaCatholic RSS Feed
 
 
 
 

The non-speaking Bible once more

I clearly touched a nerve and said what others were also thinking with yesterday’s post The Bible doesn’t say. Among the responses the one I found most interesting and sympathetically challenging was Sean the Baptist’s. He asks:

My question here relates, I guess, to the ways in which we might creatively relate the provisional senses of language that Doug calls for here, with the proclamatory dimensions of preaching in particular. In the end I think the preacher has a responsibility to say ‘this is what the Bible is saying…’. If this is modified to read ‘this is what I think the Bible is saying’ - does the preaching lose its rhetorical power?

Now I can’t exactly vouch for what I say in practice, since I don’t write, record or transcribe my sermons. I suspect that there are times when I have said (and probably will say) a sentence beginning “the BIble says …”.

However, it stands as one of many ways of phrasing things. I will also introduce sentences with (and this is not an exhaustive list)

  • Matthew says …
  • Luke seems to be teaching us …
  • Chronicles gives us an alternative way of looking at …
  • The story of Jonah seems to be aimed at …
  • John presents a Jesus who …
  • A main thrust of scripture seems to be …
  • How do we discern the word of the Lord in …
  • The gospels teach …
  • The church proclaims …

Now in the context of many such statements, I think that “the Bible says …” is much less likely to be understood as a claim to reading without interpretation, because I encourage my congregation to think along with me around and with the scriptures, rather than simply tell them what to think about them.

I rather agree with Tim’s comment that we can’t (of course) always qualify our statements out of existence. But too many preachers leave the impression that there is no qualification, interpretation, disagreement, or any other option open, far less any thinking engagement needed. “The Bible says …” mentality remains one to be resisted, even if we sometimes employ the phrase. Interpretation needs to come out of the preacher’s closet.

One Response to “The non-speaking Bible once more”

  1. 1
    Peter Kirk:

    I would prefer “God says …”, or even Jesus’ “But I say to you …”, the refrain of Matthew 5 which prompted 7:28-29. A sermon hedged with a thousand qualifications may make a good academic lecture but is not a good sermon.

Leave a Reply

Welcome

I'm Doug Chaplin, parish priest and human being. Sometimes I have thoughts I want to share. Sometimes I have thoughts I should keep to myself. Sometimes I get them confused. Happy browsing.

Categories

Previous Posts

Admin

Posts this Month

July 2008
S M T W T F S
« Jun   Aug »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll

My Sites

Legal Notice

I reserve the right to publish legal notices, emails or letters concerning the operation or content of this website at my sole discretion unless there has been an explicit agreement in advance in writing to keep such communications confidential. If you wish to guarantee that such communications remain unpublished, you must contact the site in advance to request my agreement. You can do this by emailing doug at metacatholic dot co dot uk. Any further correspondence related to an initial communication will be treated on the same terms as described in the previous paragraph, unless an explicit agreement to the contrary has been reached and confirmed in writing.

Spam Blocked